Thursday, December 20, 2012
The Stranger - The Stranger 3 - Meursault's Detachment
In this section of The Stranger, Meursault continues to show his detachment from the world. When Meursault kills the Arab, instead of the text saying outright that Meursault shot him, it is written that "The trigger gave" (59). This description of the murder implies that Meursault did not feel like a conscious part of the action. Another showing of indifference is when Meursault tells how he "Then fired four more times at the motionless body where the bullets lodged without leaving a trace" (59). Shooting someone when they are already dead is simply overkill and is a peculiar action. This peculiarity is addressed when the magistrate asks Meursault "Why did you pause between the first and second shot?" and "Why did you shoot a body that was on the ground?" and Meursault simply cannot answer these questions (67-68). Meursault is also detached from reality by not realizing the severity of what he has done. Meursault considers his case to be "pretty simple" (63). Not realizing the complexity of killing a man is a very unusual thing. Meursault doesn't even have it on his mind most of the time for he was about to shake the magistrates hand when he "remembered that [he] had killed a man", as if it were a complete afterthought (64). He states that the idea of being viewed as a criminal "[is] an idea [he] [can't] get used to" (70). Another detachment is in the form of how the narration goes from the scene of the murder to the magistrate without speaking at all about what happens in between. What happened with the party? Are Meursault and Marie still together? These facts must not seem to be important to Meursault as he tells this story, for they have been left out.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Body Paragraph - Chapter 11 - "Nothing Gold Can Stay" by Robert Frost
In "Nothing Gold Can Stay" by Robert Frost, musical devices are used to convey the nostalgic tone of watching seasons pass by in nature. Nature is personified as a female due to nature being referred to as "Her" several times (2). Gold is spoken of as "Her hardest hue to hold" (2). This alliteration is easy to read and flows off the tongue just like how the gold hue is hard to hold onto and slips away. The poem is made up of four rhyming couplets. The rhyming ties the two lines together no matter what punctuation separates them. Repetition of the word leaf in "leaf subsides to leaf" demonstrates the way that the cycle repeats itself over and over (5). There is allusion to the garden of Eden: "So Eden sank to grief, / So dawn goes down to day" (6-7). This allusion predicts that the gold will always leave, yet the idea that "dawn goes down to day" confirms that the gold will return just as day returns after night.
Monday, December 17, 2012
The Stranger - The Stranger 2 - Meursault's Indifference
Throughout the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus, Meursault is a detached and indifferent narrator. The writing style indicates this through it's choppy syntax, making sentences seem quick and straightforward. Meursault explains his life in this same straightforward manner: "Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know" (3). While Meursault seems indifferent about the world, however, he cares about how others view him: "For a second I had the ridiculous feeling that they were there to judge me" (10). Meursault acknowledges that his "feeling" is "ridiculous", which is the one of the first times that he mentions his own feelings at all. He knows that people aren't actually judging him, or so he thinks. The idea of people judging Meursault seems to make him feel the need to tell others things such as "It's not my fault" though he later admits that it "[doesn't] mean anything" to say that (3-20). Mersault stays neutral on almost all ideas posed to him, only rating them on if they are interesting or not. This causes people around his to see him as being a bit strange.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Body Paragraph - Chapter 10 - "My mistress' eyes" by William Shakespeare
In the sonnet "My mistress' eyes" by William Shakespeare, the tone of the speaker is playfully faulting for the first twelve lines and then changes to be truthfully honest and loving during the rhyming couplet. This shift in tone fits with the form of a sonnet for the first twelve lines are the perceived problem while the rhyming couplet at the end is a kind of solution to the problem presented. For the first twelve lines, the speaker tells of how his mistress does not posses hyperbolic qualities that are spoken about in many cliched love poems. He tells of how her "eyes are nothing like the sun" and how "coral is far more red than her lip's red" (1-2). This explains the "problem" that she is not like these cliches, but the truth is that no women are like this, for the standards of beauty set by love poems of the day are simply hyperbole. The comparisons of the speaker's mistress' beauty may seem as if they could be hurtful and faulting, yet they are really poking fun at the cliches and telling his mistress that she is not faulted at all to him. He admits that he does not view her as if she were a goddess, but as a human woman: "I grant I never saw a goddess go,- / My mistress when she walks treads on the ground" (11-12). This points to how he expects her to not be all of the exaggerated ideas that she was presented in contrast with. The couplet also points to this idea of truthful, honest love: "And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare / As any she belied with false compare" (13-14). The speaker tells that he only says what he says in the poem because he does not want to lie to the one he loves and wants to always be truthful with her.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #7 - The Orchids of Dorian Gray
In The Picture of Dorian Gray, flowers are used frequently as symbolism. One flower that is most commonly used is the orchid. Lord Henry describes an orchid as "a marvelous spotted thing, as effective as the seven deadly sins" (142). This associates orchids with sin, causing the purity and perfection that they represent to become tainted. Orchids also represent luxury and rare, delicate beauty. They are associated with ancient Greek culture, which also plays a part in Dorian Gray. The spots on an orchid are said to represent the blood of Christ in Christian theology, which ties in with the religious diction about the "seven deadly sins". Saying that orchids are "as effective as the seven deadly sins" insinuates that perfection and beauty lead to sinful nature, which has been Dorain's case. Orchids, like all flowers, must eventually whither and die when cut from the ground. Orchids symbolize how beauty dissolves overtime and how perfection can become skewed. This will happen to Dorian eventually, for it is just a matter of time before he is somehow cut off from the portrait's power and changed to be his true self again.
Saturday, December 1, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #6 - Distancing from the Murder
In Chapter 13 of The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian Gray murders Basil Hallward, the painter who painted the portrait of Dorian that collects Dorian's sins. The murder takes place in the room upstairs where Dorian keeps the cursed portrait. It is explained that "an uncontrollable feeling of hatred for Basil Hallward" took over Dorian "as though it had been suggested to him by the image on the canvas" (115). The painting influences Dorian to do bad things, since Dorian himself understands that he will never take on any of the repercussions in his own looks. Dorian feels loathing for Basil, an intense dislike of him, described as "the mad passions of a hunted animal" (115). Calling Dorian "a hunted animal" beings to light his fears of being sought out for doing the horrible things that he has done.
While committing the murder, Dorian tries to distance himself from what he is doing. During the struggle there is "the horrible sound of someone choking with blood" (116). Using the pronoun "someone" distances Dorian from the fact that it is Basil making this sound, and that he is killing his friend. The painter's "outstretched arms" and "grotesque stiff-fingered hands" are focused on during the murder, bringing to light how Dorian is not viewing the person being killed as an entire being, let alone a friend (116).
After the murder, Dorian admits that he is distancing himself from the murder when he states that "he felt that the secret of the whole thing was not to realize the situation" (116). The corpse of Basil Hallward is never referred to as being his, but is instead labeled as "the thing", "the murdered man", and "it" (116-117). Dorian views the body as peaceful, stating that if not for the wound and the blood, "one would have said that the man was simply asleep" (116). The idea that the body looks like it is sleeping conveys how Dorian is still trying to process that he killed Basil and yet is avoiding associating death with the body. He remarks to himself that Basil has simply "gone out of his life," also referring to a sense of leaving that is not death (116). Both sleep and leaving are not permanent and can therefore be reversed, while death cannot be. The body of Basil Hallward is also described as looking "like a dreadful wax image," which reduces the reality of the body being flesh and blood (117). Wax, like a dead body, is a substance that is first warm, but then cools and holds it's shape until heated again.
While committing the murder, Dorian tries to distance himself from what he is doing. During the struggle there is "the horrible sound of someone choking with blood" (116). Using the pronoun "someone" distances Dorian from the fact that it is Basil making this sound, and that he is killing his friend. The painter's "outstretched arms" and "grotesque stiff-fingered hands" are focused on during the murder, bringing to light how Dorian is not viewing the person being killed as an entire being, let alone a friend (116).
After the murder, Dorian admits that he is distancing himself from the murder when he states that "he felt that the secret of the whole thing was not to realize the situation" (116). The corpse of Basil Hallward is never referred to as being his, but is instead labeled as "the thing", "the murdered man", and "it" (116-117). Dorian views the body as peaceful, stating that if not for the wound and the blood, "one would have said that the man was simply asleep" (116). The idea that the body looks like it is sleeping conveys how Dorian is still trying to process that he killed Basil and yet is avoiding associating death with the body. He remarks to himself that Basil has simply "gone out of his life," also referring to a sense of leaving that is not death (116). Both sleep and leaving are not permanent and can therefore be reversed, while death cannot be. The body of Basil Hallward is also described as looking "like a dreadful wax image," which reduces the reality of the body being flesh and blood (117). Wax, like a dead body, is a substance that is first warm, but then cools and holds it's shape until heated again.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Poem Comparison - Chapter 9 - "The Lamb" and "The Tiger" by William Blake
"The Lamb" and "The Tiger" are two poems by William Blake that are able to be compared and contracted against each other. At first glance, the name ties them together, with them both being named "The" and then an animal; yet these two animals are quite different from each other. In the first poem, "The Lamb", the speaker is talking to a "Little Lamb" and asking it many questions (1). Since lamb is capitalized, the speaker is telling that he is not actually speaking to a lamb, but a person being called a Lamb. Calling the Lamb "little" emphasizes that the Lamb is innocent because it is so small. This innocence is also supported by the line "softest clothing wooly bright" to describe the softness and brightness of the person and how they are pure and innocent (6). Lambs often have white wool, so this white color adds to the purity and innocence of the person being spoken to. There Lamb is then compared to another person who "is called by thy name, / For he calls himself a Lamb" (14). This person is Jesus. At the end of the poem we learn that God is the one who made the lamb, for God blesses the lamb. By the end, one can see that this poem is a metaphor about Christianity and the lamb is a Christian who is good.
"The Tiger" is a sister-poem to "The Lamb". These two poems play off of the theme of good vs. evil. This poem also calls a person by the name of an animal, in this case "Tiger" (1). This Tiger is not a good person like the Lamb, but a person who is viewed evil. The Tiger is said to be "burning bright" like a fire with a brain forged in a "furnace" (1) (14). This association with fire reveals how a tiger is the embodiment of powerful destructive force. This could also be an association with hell. The diction in "The Tiger" is harsh, repeating words such as "dread" and speaking of "deadly terrors" (12) (16). This is quite different than the lilting sweetness of "The Lamb" who is "meek and mild" (15). With all of those evil traits and harsh words, the speaker wonders if "he who made the Lamb" made the Tiger (20). He wonders whether God made this evil person just as if he had made the good and pure person.
"The Tiger" is a sister-poem to "The Lamb". These two poems play off of the theme of good vs. evil. This poem also calls a person by the name of an animal, in this case "Tiger" (1). This Tiger is not a good person like the Lamb, but a person who is viewed evil. The Tiger is said to be "burning bright" like a fire with a brain forged in a "furnace" (1) (14). This association with fire reveals how a tiger is the embodiment of powerful destructive force. This could also be an association with hell. The diction in "The Tiger" is harsh, repeating words such as "dread" and speaking of "deadly terrors" (12) (16). This is quite different than the lilting sweetness of "The Lamb" who is "meek and mild" (15). With all of those evil traits and harsh words, the speaker wonders if "he who made the Lamb" made the Tiger (20). He wonders whether God made this evil person just as if he had made the good and pure person.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #5 - Reality vs. The Portrait
"If one doesn't talk about a thing, it has never happened. It is simply expression, as Harry says, that gives reality to things" (79).
Dorian Gray uses this line as a response to Basil Hallward as he brings up Sibyl Vane's death. Dorian claims that the idea is told "as Harry says" it, which expresses how Lord Henry still has influence over the naive Dorian's ideas. Dorian's statement that "if one doesn't talk about a thing, it has never happened" goes against the fact that, in the book, whatever Dorian does is marked on the portrait. While unseen by all but Dorian, the reality of Dorian's sins is as plain as day on the portrait, revealing that they did happen, that they were all real. The idea that "it is simply expression [...] that gives reality to things" is a viewpoint that is flawed, for events always leave some sort of a mark on the lives of those around them. Even while some events can be swept under the rug of life's conversations, the events of Dorian's life cannot be concealed forever, for even Sibyl Vane's death caused the first change in the painting.
Dorian Gray uses this line as a response to Basil Hallward as he brings up Sibyl Vane's death. Dorian claims that the idea is told "as Harry says" it, which expresses how Lord Henry still has influence over the naive Dorian's ideas. Dorian's statement that "if one doesn't talk about a thing, it has never happened" goes against the fact that, in the book, whatever Dorian does is marked on the portrait. While unseen by all but Dorian, the reality of Dorian's sins is as plain as day on the portrait, revealing that they did happen, that they were all real. The idea that "it is simply expression [...] that gives reality to things" is a viewpoint that is flawed, for events always leave some sort of a mark on the lives of those around them. Even while some events can be swept under the rug of life's conversations, the events of Dorian's life cannot be concealed forever, for even Sibyl Vane's death caused the first change in the painting.
Saturday, November 24, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #3 - Mrs. Vane's Acting
Mrs. Vane treats the world around her as if she is an actress in a play about her own life. This is expressed through the usage of theatrical diction. Mrs. Vane is quite distant from her children. She puts on facades of love and kindness but does not actually remember how to feel them: "Mrs. Vane glanced at her, and with one of those false theatrical gestures that so often become a mode of second nature to a stage-player, clasped her in her arms" (45). The action of hugging her child is described as a "false theatrical gesture", revealing that Mrs. Vane is simply acting out the part of a loving mother and feigning the actions that she feels are needed. She has to "mentally [elevate] her son to the dignity of the audience", meaning that she views the audience of one of her plays with more respect than her own son (45). She even views her life as an ever-changing tableau, passing by like scenes in a play (45). While Sibyl does not seem to have figured out her mother's distorted views on life, her brother James is able to see through his mother's act and "[hates] his mother's affectations" (47). "Affectations" means false actions that are supposed to impress others, which is exactly what his mother does. "Affectations" also sounds like affections, only having a one syllable difference, and is most likely used as a play on the two words.
Monday, November 19, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #2 - Influence in The Picture of Dorian Gray
Influence is a common theme in The Picture of Dorian Gray. The main instance where influence is taking place is between Lord Henry and Dorian Gray. Lord Henry treats his influence on Dorian like a fun study in what kind of power he has over people. Lord Henry even goes as far as to say that "there [is] something terribly enthralling in the exercise of influence" which expresses how much he likes to try and influence people around him with his ideas (26). Lord Henry's influence does get through to some people, which can be understood by how his wife mentions that she "always [hears] Harry's views from his friends" (33). The fact that Lord Henry's friends speak of his views is an example of how his influence has manifested itself in others; yet the prime example of his influence rests in Dorian Gray. Dorian freely admits that Lord Henry has "curious influence over" him (38). Dorian sees this influence, but does not try to stop it, allowing Lord Henry to continue. Dorian also tells that he is putting into practice everything that Lord Henry says (34). Dorian does not see this as a bad thing at all and admits it freely, which can lead to the understanding that, while he can see the influence taking place, he does not fully see how he himself is changing. It is either that, or that Dorian doesn't care that he is changing, for he feels that Lord Henry is telling him things that he should already understand about the world.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Poem Outline - Chapter 8 - "Siren Song" by Margaret Atwood
In "Siren Song" by Margaret Atwood, a siren speaks in first person to a passing man, asking if he wishes to learn her song and therefore killing him in the end.
The use of a siren from Greek mythology calls to mind how a woman can lure a man to her using a seemingly helpless facade and by making him feel that he can help her.
- "I don't enjoy it here / squatting on this island" (13-14)
- "This song / is a cry for help: Help me! / Only you, only you can, / you are unique / at last" (21-25)
The diction in the poem points to how sirens are portrayed in mythology.
- "looking picturesque and mythical" (15)
- "fatal and valuable" (18)
The poem itself can be interpreted as the song that the siren sings to the man.
- "This is the one song everyone / would like to learn" (1-2)
- "Alas / it is a boring song / but it works every time" (25-27)
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - PODG #1 - The Real Dorian Gray
At the end of the second chapter of The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde, there is proposed idea concerning who is the real Dorian Gray: the man or the painting. After Basil asks Lord Henry to not say something in front of Dorian, Lord Henry responds with the question: "Before which Dorian? The one who is pouring out tea for us, or the one in the picture?" (21). This inquiry implies that the living, breathing Dorian and the painted Dorian are now two separate entities and should be thought of as such. This duality may have been caused by Lord Henry's talk with Dorian about fading beauty, which changed how Dorian saw himself and the world around him. Basil, when asked whether he will join Lord Henry and Dorian for a night out, walks over to his painting of Dorian and replies "sadly" that "[he] shall stay with the real Dorian" (21). Basil sees that Dorian has changed already after knowing Lord Henry for only a small amount of time. This saddens Basil because he never wanted Dorian to be tarnished in any way. Basil feels that the painting captures the Dorian he knew before Lord Henry spoke to him and therefore feels that that Dorian is the most "real" to him.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
The Picture of Dorian Gray - Preface - Aestheticism and Wilde's View on his Audience
The preface of A Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde deals with aestheticism and Wilde's attitude towards his audience. Aestheticism was a movement in British and American art that sought the acceptance of artistic beauty and taste as a fundamental standard. Oscar Wilde was a firm supporter of aestheticism and tries to explain it to his readers in the preface. He tells of the difference between being corrupt and cultivated, the lacking of ethical sympathies in artists, and other ideas of aestheticism. Wilde uses two metaphors in the preface, the first being: "the nineteenth century dislike of Realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass" (vii). This metaphor utilizes the character Caliban from Shakespeare's The Tempest, a savage human, to symbolize society. This metaphor explains that society doesn't like Realism because it brings out the ugly truth in the world. The second metaphor is: "the nineteenth century dislike of Romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass" (vii). This metaphor explains that society does not like Romanticism because it is too unlike society, too fanciful and unbelievable. In the end, many members of society may never be fully happy with art until they just try to appreciate it for what it is and not what they want it to be.
Wilde's attitude towards his audience is one of acceptance with minimal disagreement and disappointment. Wilde, having heard and read that there are diverse opinions about his book, explains that such varying opinions are normal. He says that these diverse opinions "[show] that the work is new, complex, and vital," turning a possible negative into a positive and accepting that there will be critics (viii). Wilde disagrees with what some of the opinions are claiming stating that "there is no such thing as a moral or immoral book" (vii). This statement relates to Wilde's views of aestheticism where morality does not play a role. He is telling his readers that he is writing the book with the ideas of aestheticism in mind and that he wants the readers to try and think this way as well. He is writing the book because he wants to send out a message and wishes for his readers to try to understand the message along with how the book is written.
Wilde's attitude towards his audience is one of acceptance with minimal disagreement and disappointment. Wilde, having heard and read that there are diverse opinions about his book, explains that such varying opinions are normal. He says that these diverse opinions "[show] that the work is new, complex, and vital," turning a possible negative into a positive and accepting that there will be critics (viii). Wilde disagrees with what some of the opinions are claiming stating that "there is no such thing as a moral or immoral book" (vii). This statement relates to Wilde's views of aestheticism where morality does not play a role. He is telling his readers that he is writing the book with the ideas of aestheticism in mind and that he wants the readers to try and think this way as well. He is writing the book because he wants to send out a message and wishes for his readers to try to understand the message along with how the book is written.
Monday, November 5, 2012
Poem Outline - Chapter 7 - "Sorting Laundry" by Elisavietta Ritchie
In "Sorting Laundry" by Elisavietta Ritchie, a woman is folding laundry while thinking about her relationship, using each piece to talk about another aspect of the relationship.
The metaphors and similes in the poem express the relationship of the speaker and her partner and the uncertainty starts to build.
The symbolism digs into the deeper feelings of the relationship.
The overstatement at the end of the poem wraps up the idea of how devastated the speaker would be if she was left by her partner.
The metaphors and similes in the poem express the relationship of the speaker and her partner and the uncertainty starts to build.
- "Folding clothes, / I think of folding you / into my life" (1-3)
- "Our king-sized sheets / like tablecloths / for the banquets of giants" (4-5)
- "Myriad uncoupled socks / which went paired into the foam / like those creatures from the ark" (22-24)
The symbolism digs into the deeper feelings of the relationship.
- "Pillowcases, despite so many / washings, seams still / holding our dreams" (7-9)
- "Well-washed dollars, legal tender / for all debts public and private, / intact despite agitation" (34-36)
- "The strangely tailored shirt / left by a former lover" (41-42)
The overstatement at the end of the poem wraps up the idea of how devastated the speaker would be if she was left by her partner.
- "If you were to leave me [...] / a mountain of unsorted wash / could not fill / the empty side of the bed" (43-51)
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
1984 #9 - "War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength" Notes
- World is only three superpowers now – Oceania, Eastasia, and Eurasia (185); “Eurasia comprises […] and Tibet” (185); Layout of the current world; “have no material cause for fighting, and are not divided by any genuine ideological difference” (186); Brought up again on pages 186 and 187
- “In the centers of civilization […] War has in fact changed its character” (186)
- “In spite of the regrouping which occurs every few years, it is always the same war” (186); “None of the three superstates could be definitely conquered even by the other two in combination” (186); “Eurasia is protected by its vast land spaces, Oceania by the width of the Atlantic and the Pacific, Eastasia by the fecundity and industriousness of its inhabitants” (186)
- “It is a war for labor power” (187); The “quadrilateral” that is fought over “with its corners at Tangier, Brazzaville, Darwin, and Hong Kong, containing within it about a fifth of the population of the earth” (187); “All of the disputed territories contain valuable minerals, and some of them yield important vegetable products such as rubber” (187)
- Wavering frontiers, never really much change, just places being “captured and recaptured” , “the balance of power always remains roughly even” (188)
- “Moreover, […] different” (188); Nothing would ever change, always a power struggle, eternal wartime even without slave product production; “The primary aim of modern warfare […] is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living” (188)
- “The world today […] looked forward” (188); Proof that the current world is worse than the past and is also much worse than the projected future; “The world is more primitive today than it was fifty years ago” (189)
- “the machine” (189); The idea that invention would better the future, held in high regard
- “All-around increase in wealth threatened the destruction – indeed, in some sense it was the destruction – of a hierarchical society” (189); “If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction” (190)
- “For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike […] poverty and ignorance” (190); Ignorance is Strength, if proles were given money, they would become conscious of Party’s wrongdoing
- “The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they need not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare” (190-191); War is Peace: constantly being at war stops money and goods from getting to the people, keeping them ignorant and thus keeping them from uprising, therefore keeping the society peaceful; “War is a way […] too intelligent” (191)
- Weapons are made to expend labor power that can’t be consumed (191); “In principle […] another” (191); Keeps class distinctions cleanly separated
- “And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste system seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival” (192)
- “War, it will be seen, not only accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way” (192); “It does not matter […] exist” (192)
- “In his capacity as an administrator […] world” (192-193); Inner Party knows the lie, yet believes it
- “In Oceania at […] Ingsoc” (193); “The fields are cultivated with horse plows while books are written by machinery” (193); Juxtaposition, contrast
- “The two aims of the Part are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought” (193)
- Scientists either “psychologist and inquisitor” or chemist, physicist, or biologist” (193-194); For learning what people think and killing lots of people without warning
- “But none of these projects ever comes anywhere near realization, and none of the three superstates ever gains a significant lead on the others” (194)
- “None of the three superstates ever attempts any maneuver which involves the risk of serious defeat” (195); surprise attacks, backstabs to truces; one true plan is “impossible of realization” (195)
- “The average citizen […] evaporate” (196); keeping people ignorant about other cultures; “The conditions of life in all three superstates are very much the same” (196); Oceania = Ingsoc, Eurasia = Neo-Bolshevism, Eastasia = Death-worship/Obliteration of Self; “The three philosophies are barely distinguishable, and the social systems which they support are not distinguishable at all” (197)
- “It follows that […] without victory” (197); they all know exactly what they are doing
- “War was one of the main instruments by which human societies were kept in touch with physical reality”, “Physical facts could not be ignored. In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an airplane they had to make four” (197); they can say whatever they want but just by building things they are going against it
- “Efficiency, even military efficiency, is no longer needed” (198)
- “Cut off from […] which is down” (198)
- “They are obliged […] they choose” (198-199); omnipotent, but want to be omniscient, can force omniscience if they only teach people certain things
- “It is like battles […] one another” (199); animalistic, pointless, inefficient
- “The war is waged […] exist” (199)
- “A peace that was truly permanent would be the same as a permanent war” (199)
- “Even after […] the other” (201)
- “The aim of the High […] equal” (201)
- “Of the three groups, only the Low are never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims”, “From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has ever meant much more than a change in the name of their masters” (202)
- “Now, however, […] long” (203)
- “The new movements […] had the conscious aim of perpetuating unfreedom and inequality”, “But the purpose of all of them was to arrest progress and freeze history at a chosen moment”, “As usual […] permanently” (203)
- “Even if it […] averted” (204); Equality is a threat
- “And in the general hardening […] progressive” (204-205); Regression to old, inhumane tactics and practices
- “As compared with […] opposition” “By comparison with that existing today, all the tyrannies of the past were half-hearted and inefficient” (205)
- “The invention of print […] private life came to an end” (205-206); Information now able to be given to the masses; People able to be viewed at all times; Want to enforce “complete obedience to the will of the State” and spread ideas for “complete uniformity of opinion on all subjects” (206)
- “Collectively, the Party owns everything in Oceania, because it controls everything and disposes of the products it thinks fit”; “no longer private property” = “private property” (206)
- Four ways a ruling group can fall from power: 1) “conquered from without”; 2) governs inefficiently, stirring the masses to revolt; 3) “allows a strong and disconnected Middle Group to come into being”; 4) looses self-confidence and will to govern (207); All four come into play; “Ultimately the determining factor is the mental attitude of the ruling class itself” (207)
- “The masses […] articulate” (207); Basically the idea posed that the proles will not revolt until conscious and they will only become conscious by revolting; “The consciousness of the masses needs only to be influenced in a negative way” (208)
- “Big Brother is the guise […] organization” (208); trying to seem relatable
- Big Brother = overall ruler, Inner Party = brains, Outer Party = hands, Proles = dumb masses, “not a permanent or necessary part of the structure” (208)
- “In no part of […] knows” (209)
- “Proletarians, in practice, […] eliminated” (209); never allowed to be intelligent because already allowed to feel, so cannot move up because know both intelligence and emotion
- “The essence of oligarchical […] the living”, “The Party is not […] the same” (210); never-ending cycle of those in power are chosen to be that way to carry on ideas
- “They can be granted intellectual […] be tolerated” (210); major difference between the proles and Party; thinking not allowed by those who can
- “A Party member lives […] alone.” (210)
- “Many of the […] any subject whatever” (211); able to think, but not as well as they could be able to if not fed Ingsoc’s ideas in childhood
- Crimestop – stopping yourself from “dangerous thought”; “Protective stupidity” (212)
- “Oceanic society rests ultimately on the belief that Big Brother is omnipotent and that the Party is infallible. But since […] treatment of facts” (212)
- Blackwhite – “Applied to an opponent […] this”; ties in with doublethink (212)
- Alteration of past: 1) to stop all standards of comparison; 2) “safeguard the infallibility of the Party” (212-213); “To change one’s mind, or even one’s policy, is a confession of weakness”; “The mutability of the past is the central tenet of Ingsoc”; “Past events […] have no objective existence” that can’t be changed or swayed to believe (213)
- Doublethink – “reality control”; contradicting ideas known and accepted at once; “lie always one leap ahead of the truth” (214)
- “The secret of rulership […] past mistakes” (215)
- “The greater the understanding, the greater the delusion: the more intelligent, the less sane” (215); shown by Wilson’s confusion and him thinking he might be a lunatic
- “peculiar linking-together of opposites – knowledge with ignorance, cynicism with fanaticism” “official ideology abounds with contradictions even when there is no practical reason for them”, “Even the names […] doublethink” (216)
- “Being in a minority, even a minority of one, does not make you mad” “if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad” (217); “Sanity is not statistical” (218)
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
1984 #8 - The Wine of 1984
In George Orwell's novel 1984, wine represents the past and the dream of a future that is like the past. Wine is said to have "belonged to the vanished, romantic past" meaning it is no longer viewed as a needed item in Winston's society, but it was nice while it was around (173). Winston has "read and dreamed about" wine just as he has read and dreamed about the past (173). Just like he believed that wine would have "an intensely sweet taste [...] and an immediate intoxicating effect", Winston believes that the past was probably better than the present and had easier living (173). This thought connects with the fact that Winston may believe the future will be bright and an intense change, but then it will easy to live in. However, wine turns out to be "distinctly disappointing", which could be foreshadowing that either the plan for the future fails or that it turns out to not be what anyone expected (173). The idea that "after years of gin drinking" Winston "could barely taste" the wine relates to the fact that, after living in an oppressive, emotion-stripping society (the gin), the new society could be hard to adjust to (the wine) (173). The "sour-sweet smell" alludes that the plan to make the future happen is both good and bad: bad things must be done for a good cause (173).
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
1984 #3 and #4 - The Bells of 1984
It comes up in this part of George Orwell's novel 1984 that the main character, Winston, has "never in real life heard church bells ringing" (99). The main reason that this is true is because under Big Brother there is no religion, therefore there are no churches; However, bells are used here as a symbol. Bells symbolize many things: celebration, awakening, victory. In this case, none of these have occurred in Winston's lifetime. There is no celebration, at least, not for long, and never genuine. It is always in praise of a new lie told by the Party that everyone swallows up and believes. There is no awakening, because "orthodoxy means not thinking - not needing to think. Orthodoxy means unconsciousness"; everyone is lulled into a hypnotic state of living and believing in whatever they are told to believe in and nothing else (53). They can't even try to think of anything different, because that would be thought-crime and punishable. There is also no victory, at least not true victory. The country of Oceania is always at war with someone, and while there are battles won, nothing is ever fully settled. These are reasons why Winston is only able to have "the illusion of actually hearing the bells, the bells of a lost London that still existed somewhere or other, disguised and forgotten" (99). Winston hears these bells in his mind; waking up to the fact that somehow and somewhere there is still hope for a future that is unlike the present. Also in the theme of bells, at the end of book one, the slogans of the Party are described as being "like a leaden knell" (104). They are echoing phrases that are heavy and solemn, not at all like the clear, beautiful sounds of church bells.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
1984 #2 - The Children of 1984
In the society of George Orwell's novel 1984, children have been turned into feared beings. No longer innocent, children have been tamed by the Party to be violent yet obedient at young ages. This fraction of the dystopian society is expressed in the children of Winston's neighbors, the Parsons, whose two young children assault Winston with fake weapons. Children are made to join groups such as "the Spies" where children "[turn] into ungovernable little savages, and yet [...] this [produces] in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party" (24). They are lulled into "[adoring] the Party and everything connected to it" (24). They are desensitized to violence and praised for relaying information to the Party about possibly traitorous persons, even if these people are their own parents.
Children view the whole idea of the Party as a game, which is what allows the Party to plant their ideas inside the malleable minds of the children, allowing the next generation to be even more obedient towards the Party as the one before. This relates to the third slogan of the Party: "Ignorance is strength" (4). Since this new generation of children is the first to grow up fully under Party rule, they do not know of any other life. This means that they are able to be brainwashed from birth and are fully under the Party's control even at only the age of seven. Children learn and grow by copying what they see around them, and with all the propaganda around them, it is only natural that they would start to feel that that is what they should follow. In fact, "it [is] almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children", because those who are over thirty still faintly remember what it was like to grow up without the Party's rule and some still see that the Party is wrong (24). Parents are unable to stop their children from becoming enamored with the Party, however, for they are unable to tell their kids what they think and feel. While the children are young, parents cannot express their ideas due to the telescreens. Once the children are older, trying to tell them that the Party may not be fully correct would result in the children telling on their parents. There is no way to break the cycle.
Children view the whole idea of the Party as a game, which is what allows the Party to plant their ideas inside the malleable minds of the children, allowing the next generation to be even more obedient towards the Party as the one before. This relates to the third slogan of the Party: "Ignorance is strength" (4). Since this new generation of children is the first to grow up fully under Party rule, they do not know of any other life. This means that they are able to be brainwashed from birth and are fully under the Party's control even at only the age of seven. Children learn and grow by copying what they see around them, and with all the propaganda around them, it is only natural that they would start to feel that that is what they should follow. In fact, "it [is] almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children", because those who are over thirty still faintly remember what it was like to grow up without the Party's rule and some still see that the Party is wrong (24). Parents are unable to stop their children from becoming enamored with the Party, however, for they are unable to tell their kids what they think and feel. While the children are young, parents cannot express their ideas due to the telescreens. Once the children are older, trying to tell them that the Party may not be fully correct would result in the children telling on their parents. There is no way to break the cycle.
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Body Paragraph - Chapter 6 - "Fire and Ice" by Robert Frost
In the poem "Fire and Ice", Robert Frost tells of two ways that the world may end. The first of the two ways it may end is by fire. The speaker tells: "from what I've tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire" (3-4). The speaker compares desire and fire, ultimately saying that they are similar. The fact that desire, an extreme feeling, is related to fire emphasizes that desire is like fire itself. Those who desire for something want it with a fiery, burning passion. The speaker's words that they've "tasted of desire" mean that they have felt it and understand it's complexity and the power that it has. If too many people desire too many things, their greed could be the end of the world.
The speaker then tells: "I think I know enough of hate / To say that for destruction ice / Is also great" (6-8). This time, hate and ice are compared to each other. Hate is also an extreme feeling like desire, yet it is an emotion that turns people against others; It is cold and unfeeling. The speaker's personal knowledge of hate is less than that of desire, for they say "I think I know enough of hate". This means that, while they have felt hate and witnessed it before, they still show doubt as to if they understand it fully. In the end, the speaker makes the point that, while fire is probably the better of the two, ice "would suffice" (9)
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad - Blog Post 4
The last part of Heart of Darkness takes place back in England when Marlow goes to see Kurtz's intended. Though it has been more than a year, she is still in mourning over her beloved Kurtz's death. Marlow narrates his encounter as it progresses and darkness sets in: "But with every word spoken the room was growing darker, and only her forehead, smooth and white, remained illuminated by the inextinguishable light of belief and love" (154).
As Kurtz's intended speaks about how great Kurtz was, the room begins to grow darker and darker around her and Marlow. The room is being plagued with talk of Kurtz, for he became a dark, corrupt, and hollow man as he lived in Africa. The darkness encloses around both Marlow and Kurtz's intended, yet the forehead of Kurtz's intended is still brightly "illuminated by the inextinguishable light of belief and love". The forehead is a sign of knowledge and belief, for it is where the brain is, which controls a person. The fact that her forehead is still illuminated even in encroaching darkness visually expresses how Kurtz's intended feels that she was enlightened by Kurtz and that she believed in him and loved him dearly. The fact that the light it "inextinguishable" conveys how Marlow sees that Kurtz's intended still has a passion for what she feels she learned from him.
As Kurtz's intended speaks about how great Kurtz was, the room begins to grow darker and darker around her and Marlow. The room is being plagued with talk of Kurtz, for he became a dark, corrupt, and hollow man as he lived in Africa. The darkness encloses around both Marlow and Kurtz's intended, yet the forehead of Kurtz's intended is still brightly "illuminated by the inextinguishable light of belief and love". The forehead is a sign of knowledge and belief, for it is where the brain is, which controls a person. The fact that her forehead is still illuminated even in encroaching darkness visually expresses how Kurtz's intended feels that she was enlightened by Kurtz and that she believed in him and loved him dearly. The fact that the light it "inextinguishable" conveys how Marlow sees that Kurtz's intended still has a passion for what she feels she learned from him.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad - Blog Post 3
A new character that is introduced in this part of Heart of Darkness is a young man who is simply referred to as "the Russian" (132). He is first spotted on the bank in front of the station, where Marlow tells that "he looked like a harlequin" because of his brightly patched clothing (126). This association that is made between the Russian and a clownish, comedic figure sets up an air of innocence around him. This air of innocence is emphasized by the way Marlow describes him as the steamship pulls closer to the shore: "A beardless, boyish face, very fair" (126). The fact that the Russian is "beardless" and has a "boyish face" suggests that he is young, but not young enough to actually be a boy anymore. The observation that the Russian has "very fair" complexion conveys that he has not been in the sun much, presumably covered in the jungle for a long time. This also gives off an air of innocence, for the Russian looks as though he is not weathered and has not traveled much, but later he is told to have been lonely and traveling for quite some time. The knowledge that the Russian has done so much traveling and been so alone makes it strange but intriguing how a man like him can stay so youthful and innocent.
The Russian is also said to have had "smiles and frowns chasing each other over that open countenance like sunshine and shadow" (126). The verb choice of "chasing" gives off a feeling of playfulness and joy as if the Russian's emotions are a game. The Russian's mood shifts back and forth from happy to sad quite often, as if running after itself one after another. The Russian is at times "like sunshine" - light and happy - and at times "like [...] shadow" - dark and morose; however, he is never both at once. His "open countenance" tells that his emotions can be easily read on his face; he is an open book.
Marlow also tells that the Russian has "no features to speak of" (126). He says this while describing the Russian outright, clearly pointing out features that he notices about the Russian, so saying that the Russian has "no features to speak of" is a strange statement; However, this may go along with the point that the Russian is never given a name, though he is quite important to the plot of the story. Giving this man a name would make him less of a mystery, for Marlow doubts "whether [he] had ever really seen him - whether it was possible to meet such a phenomenon" (140).
The Russian is also said to have had "smiles and frowns chasing each other over that open countenance like sunshine and shadow" (126). The verb choice of "chasing" gives off a feeling of playfulness and joy as if the Russian's emotions are a game. The Russian's mood shifts back and forth from happy to sad quite often, as if running after itself one after another. The Russian is at times "like sunshine" - light and happy - and at times "like [...] shadow" - dark and morose; however, he is never both at once. His "open countenance" tells that his emotions can be easily read on his face; he is an open book.
Marlow also tells that the Russian has "no features to speak of" (126). He says this while describing the Russian outright, clearly pointing out features that he notices about the Russian, so saying that the Russian has "no features to speak of" is a strange statement; However, this may go along with the point that the Russian is never given a name, though he is quite important to the plot of the story. Giving this man a name would make him less of a mystery, for Marlow doubts "whether [he] had ever really seen him - whether it was possible to meet such a phenomenon" (140).
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad - Blog Post 2
"He was there below me, and, upon my word, to look at him was as edifying as seeing a dog in a parody of breeches and a feather hat, walking on it's hind legs" (Conrad 106).
In this quote, Marlow is describing an African man who was brought along to help run the steamship. Using one of his classic similes, Marlow compares the benefit of seeing the African man working to a "dog... walking on it's hind legs". This is an unnatural occurrence, for dogs are not meant to walk on two legs like people. Therefore, Marlow does not view this working African man as a natural occurrence. The dog in the "breeches and a feather hat" is parodying a person; However, dressing a dog in fancy clothes and standing him on two feet does not make a dog a person, just a humorous spectacle. This can be compared to Marlow's feeling that teaching an African how to work a steamship does not make him a European. This exposes Marlow's racism and his view that the African people are inferior to the Europeans, but are being made to act like they belong among them. In fact, Marlow later states that the African man "ought to have been clapping his hands and stamping his feet on the bank" (106). Marlow feels that the African man does not belong, and instead should be acting like the other Africans that the steamship passes. Also, while the African man is physically "below" Marlow on the steamship, he is also metaphorically below Marlow because he is seen as inferior to Europeans.
In this quote, Marlow is describing an African man who was brought along to help run the steamship. Using one of his classic similes, Marlow compares the benefit of seeing the African man working to a "dog... walking on it's hind legs". This is an unnatural occurrence, for dogs are not meant to walk on two legs like people. Therefore, Marlow does not view this working African man as a natural occurrence. The dog in the "breeches and a feather hat" is parodying a person; However, dressing a dog in fancy clothes and standing him on two feet does not make a dog a person, just a humorous spectacle. This can be compared to Marlow's feeling that teaching an African how to work a steamship does not make him a European. This exposes Marlow's racism and his view that the African people are inferior to the Europeans, but are being made to act like they belong among them. In fact, Marlow later states that the African man "ought to have been clapping his hands and stamping his feet on the bank" (106). Marlow feels that the African man does not belong, and instead should be acting like the other Africans that the steamship passes. Also, while the African man is physically "below" Marlow on the steamship, he is also metaphorically below Marlow because he is seen as inferior to Europeans.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Body Paragraph - Chapter 5 - "The Author to Her Book" by Anne Bradstreet
The author of the poem uses personification to emphasize that speaker's book is like her child, for she brought it into the world . The first indication of this is the words used to describe the book throughout the poem. The speaker refers to her book as "offspring", which can mean both child and also the product of something, in this case, her writing (1). The use of this word starts the idea of the book being her child and the idea is carried on throughout the poem. The word "birth" is used to describe when the book came into being after it was written by the speaker, which makes the book seem as if it were a baby being brought into the world (2).
The speaker does not like her book, for she calls it "ill-formed" and created from her "feeble brain", showing how she feels inadequate as a writer and that this book of hers is not what she wanted it to be (1). The speaker constantly sees flaws in her work, which she is constantly trying to change: "I washed thy face, but more defects I saw, / And rubbing off a spot, still made a flaw" (13-14). The personification in giving the book a "face" gives the imagery of a mother trying to clean off her child to make them look proper; Yet the speaker sees herself in her book: "Thy visage was so irksome in my sight; / Yet being mine own, at length affection would / Thy blemishes amend, if I so could" (10-12). She tells herself that overtime she will try to oversee what she feels is wrong with her creation and learn to love it, since it is really a reflection of herself. The use of the word "visage" underscores the personification of the book, for the word visage is even more descriptive than the word "face", for it refers to the features and emotions on a face.
The last two lines give the poem a sad undertone: "And for thy Mother, she alas is poor, / Which caused her thus to send thee out of door" (23-24). She refers to herself as the "Mother" of the book, her child. She seems to be explaining to this child that, since their mother is poor, she needs to send them out into the real world. Since her child is her book, she's referring to having to sell her writing, her book, to get money.
The speaker does not like her book, for she calls it "ill-formed" and created from her "feeble brain", showing how she feels inadequate as a writer and that this book of hers is not what she wanted it to be (1). The speaker constantly sees flaws in her work, which she is constantly trying to change: "I washed thy face, but more defects I saw, / And rubbing off a spot, still made a flaw" (13-14). The personification in giving the book a "face" gives the imagery of a mother trying to clean off her child to make them look proper; Yet the speaker sees herself in her book: "Thy visage was so irksome in my sight; / Yet being mine own, at length affection would / Thy blemishes amend, if I so could" (10-12). She tells herself that overtime she will try to oversee what she feels is wrong with her creation and learn to love it, since it is really a reflection of herself. The use of the word "visage" underscores the personification of the book, for the word visage is even more descriptive than the word "face", for it refers to the features and emotions on a face.
The last two lines give the poem a sad undertone: "And for thy Mother, she alas is poor, / Which caused her thus to send thee out of door" (23-24). She refers to herself as the "Mother" of the book, her child. She seems to be explaining to this child that, since their mother is poor, she needs to send them out into the real world. Since her child is her book, she's referring to having to sell her writing, her book, to get money.
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad - Blog Post 1
"Lifting one arm from the elbow, the palm of the hand outwards, so that, with his legs folded before him, he had the pose of a Buddha preaching in European clothes and without a lotus-flower" (Conrad 69).
Marlow is described to have "the pose of a Buddha" while he begins to recount his story to the other crew members of the ship. Though he has not yet told his story, there is a sense that he is full of knowledge and that he is trying to pass it on to those around him.
Marlow is in the same pose as Buddha, with the "palm of his hand outwards" and "his legs folded before him". The palm of his hand facing outwards represents how he is trying to open up about his experiences, however he is also crossing his legs, which can be viewed as him not wanting to open up or being anxious about doing so. Buddha is a religious figure of Buddhism. The word Buddha means "enlightened" or "awakened", and Marlow seems to have become enlightened and awakened after seeing and becoming a part of the horrors of imperialism.
It is also pointed out that Marlow is "Buddha preaching in European clothes". The European feel of Marlow is a contrast to the idea of him looking like and being like the Buddha in this moment. The idea of preaching brings to mind a church, a European concept, while the clothes are stated outright to be European. There seems to be a sharp juxtaposition of Eastern and Western culture that throws off the idea of Marlow being like the Buddha., due to the drastic differences between the East and West at the time this book was written
Marlow is said to be the "Buddha... without a lotus-flower". The lotus flower is a beautiful flower that grows in muddy water, but rises above it to bloom. When a lotus has bloomed, it is said to have reached enlightenment, for it has risen above the darkness and murkiness. A large part of Buddhism is the idea of becoming enlightened and pure, even when there is surrounding trouble. The "lotus-flower" has two symbolic meanings in Buddhism: fortune and purification. First, Marlow never started his journey for the sake of money, but for the intrigue of adventure. Therefore, he would not have the flower because he lacked the motivation of fortune. Second, Marlow is not pure of heart, mind, and spirit because of the destruction and harm that he caused in the past. He committed actions that he can never undo, and therefore can never be pure again.
Marlow is described to have "the pose of a Buddha" while he begins to recount his story to the other crew members of the ship. Though he has not yet told his story, there is a sense that he is full of knowledge and that he is trying to pass it on to those around him.
Marlow is in the same pose as Buddha, with the "palm of his hand outwards" and "his legs folded before him". The palm of his hand facing outwards represents how he is trying to open up about his experiences, however he is also crossing his legs, which can be viewed as him not wanting to open up or being anxious about doing so. Buddha is a religious figure of Buddhism. The word Buddha means "enlightened" or "awakened", and Marlow seems to have become enlightened and awakened after seeing and becoming a part of the horrors of imperialism.
It is also pointed out that Marlow is "Buddha preaching in European clothes". The European feel of Marlow is a contrast to the idea of him looking like and being like the Buddha in this moment. The idea of preaching brings to mind a church, a European concept, while the clothes are stated outright to be European. There seems to be a sharp juxtaposition of Eastern and Western culture that throws off the idea of Marlow being like the Buddha., due to the drastic differences between the East and West at the time this book was written
Marlow is said to be the "Buddha... without a lotus-flower". The lotus flower is a beautiful flower that grows in muddy water, but rises above it to bloom. When a lotus has bloomed, it is said to have reached enlightenment, for it has risen above the darkness and murkiness. A large part of Buddhism is the idea of becoming enlightened and pure, even when there is surrounding trouble. The "lotus-flower" has two symbolic meanings in Buddhism: fortune and purification. First, Marlow never started his journey for the sake of money, but for the intrigue of adventure. Therefore, he would not have the flower because he lacked the motivation of fortune. Second, Marlow is not pure of heart, mind, and spirit because of the destruction and harm that he caused in the past. He committed actions that he can never undo, and therefore can never be pure again.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Poem Outline - Chapter 3 - "Pathedy of Manners" by Ellen Kay
In "Pathedy of Manners" by Ellen Kay, a woman is viewed by the narrator as this woman's her life goes by, telling of the choices that she makes and how her life turns out because of them.
The word choice in the poem tries to be something it isn't, like the woman in the story, and therefore seems unfitting or unsettling in their contexts.
There are words in the poem that appear more than once and bear significance to different parts of the poem.
The word choice in the poem tries to be something it isn't, like the woman in the story, and therefore seems unfitting or unsettling in their contexts.
- "She learned the cultured jargon" (5)
- "They had an ideal marriage, and ideal / But lonely children in an ideal house" (15-16)
There are words in the poem that appear more than once and bear significance to different parts of the poem.
- "At twenty she was brilliant and adored... sought for every dance" (1-2). "A hundred people call, though not one friend, / ... She will walk / Alone in brilliant circles to the end" (25-28).
- "Those bred / To antique crystal and authentic pearls" (5-6). "A bright young man whose pearl cufflinks were real" (14).
The woman's life started to take a turn for the worse as she let others interfere, and word-choice is also able to expose this.
- "And when she might have thought, conversed instead" (8).
- "She shuns conviction, choosing to infer / Tenets of every mind except her own" (23-24).
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Poem Outline - Chapter 2 - "Mirror" by Sylvia Plath
In "Mirror" by Sylvia Plath, the personification of reflective surfaces gives an original look at places and people through the perspective of mirrors that see the world around them and how they affect people overtime.
The use of a mirror as the narrator of the poem allows for a non-judgmental viewpoint.
The diction in the poem is dark and morbid.
The use of a mirror as the narrator of the poem allows for a non-judgmental viewpoint.
- "I am silver and exact. I have no preconceptions" (1).
- "Whatever I see I swallow immediately / Just as it is, unmisted by love or dislike. / I am not cruel, only truthful" (2-4).
The diction in the poem is dark and morbid.
- "She rewards me with tears and an agitation of hands" (14).
- "In me she has drowned a young girl, and in me an old woman / Rises toward her day after day, like a terrible fish" (17-18).
The syntax and diction of the poem make it seem slow and calming, yet also deep and dark.
- There are many periods in the poem, more than there are commas. Many of the lines stop at the ends.
- The lines are long and, even with stops, draw themselves out with their words.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Poem Outline - Chapter 1 - "The Eagle" by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
"The Eagle" is a majestic and dynamic poem that describes the life and flight of an eagle in an outlook that is fresh and intense.
Alliteration is used the most in the first stanza of the poem.
The structure and rhyme used in the poem both bring the stanzas of the poem together and yet separate it into two parts as well.
The imagery used in the poem makes the poem lively and unique.
Alliteration is used the most in the first stanza of the poem.
- "He clasps the crag with crooked hands;" (1).
- "lonely lands" (2).
The structure and rhyme used in the poem both bring the stanzas of the poem together and yet separate it into two parts as well.
- "hands" (1), "lands" (2), "stands" (3); "crawls" (4), "walls" (5), "falls" (6)
- " He clasps the crag with crooked hands;" (1), "The wrinkled sea beneath him crawls;" (4)
The imagery used in the poem makes the poem lively and unique.
- "close to the sun lonely lands" (2), "azure world" (3), "wrinkled sea" (4)
- "and like a thunderbolt he falls" (6)
Monday, September 3, 2012
The Tempest - Analyzing Prospero's Character in Act 5, Scene 1, Lines 1-97
In Act 5, Scene 1, Lines 1-97 of The
Tempest, Prospero's plan has began to reach its conclusion. He is
having a good day and everything is working in his favor, for Prospero is
someone who plans ahead. He has had his whole idea of
revenge outlined in his mind since the very beginning of the play and probably even years before the play begins. Prospero also has Ariel
by his side to makes sure that everything runs smoothly, however, if
anything does not go as planned, Ariel can help Prospero get everything back on
the right track.
An aspect of Prospero's character that helps him in his plans is his commanding presence. Prospero has a commanding presence because he is able to control spirits and the magical arts. Prospero uses this power along with his strategically-thinking brain to get the upper hand in most situations. This upper hand starts at the beginning of the play with the tempest. Though Prospero relies on his magic to help get him this upper hand, he acknowledges in lines 50-57 that he will get rid of his magic when he no longer needs it. This time comes in lines 83-86 when he is ready to step back into his position as the Duke of Milan.
An aspect of Prospero's character that helps him in his plans is his commanding presence. Prospero has a commanding presence because he is able to control spirits and the magical arts. Prospero uses this power along with his strategically-thinking brain to get the upper hand in most situations. This upper hand starts at the beginning of the play with the tempest. Though Prospero relies on his magic to help get him this upper hand, he acknowledges in lines 50-57 that he will get rid of his magic when he no longer needs it. This time comes in lines 83-86 when he is ready to step back into his position as the Duke of Milan.
Prospero cares
about the people who he got caught in the tempest. In lines 25-27,
Prospero tells that though he remembers the wrongdoings of the people he
shipwrecked, he will no longer be angry at them. Prospero is forgiving,
but he does call out those who have done him wrong because he wants them to
remember exactly what they did to him. This helps define
that Prospero still has his emotions and his feelings. He is still human.
Ariel points this out when he tells Prospero that, if Prospero saw the
shipwrecked group that he was holding, his "affections / would become
tender" (5.1.18-19). Prospero
is someone who understands and keeps his promises and
contracts. In the end, Ariel is set free after his allotted time
of servitude and those who were shipwrecked are allowed to go back to
Italy. Throughout the play, those who were shipwrecked
remain physically unharmed, just like Prospero wanted.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
How The Tempest Relates to the Standard Structure of Shakespearean Comedy
In The Tempest, the character Prospero fits the role of a Shakespearean "Comic Individual". In Act 1, Scene 2, Prospero explains the story of his downfall to his daughter, Miranda. Prospero was once the Duke of Milan, but began to study books about magic and other areas that he believed would better his mind. Studying these books soon became Prospero's obsession and he secluded himself and ignored his people and his duties as the Duke. Ignoring his duties caused his brother, Antonio, to be allowed to take over Prospero's position as Duke of Milan, while Prospero and Miranda were exiled to go live on a deserted island. Prospero is a Comic Individual, for his actions caused his negative situation to occur and there is no one at fault but Prospero. Also, like a Comic Individual, Prospero never loses his rationality. While he does create a tempest that capsizes the ship of those who exiled him, he makes sure that no one dies or gets hurt in any way at all. Prospero only wants the people on the ship to feel the emotional pain and suffering that he did when he was exiled, and does not wish death or harm upon any of them.
The ending of The Tempest is that of a Shakespearean "Comic Solution". The ending is a happy ending, for Prospero is allowed to once again take his place as the Duke of Milan. However, Prospero must remember and become the Duke he was before his obsession made him turn a blind eye to his people and his duties. In Act 5, Scene 1, Prospero vows that he will break his staff and bury it and that he will also throw his book into the sea where he can never find it again. He also frees his servant spirit, Ariel, as his last words before the Epilogue, sending the spirit off unburdened and no longer under his command. These actions make sure that Prospero never falls back into his old ways and that his obsession will never relapse. With those distractions gone, Prospero is able to take back into his rightful place as Duke of Milan and serve as the leader he should be.
The ending of The Tempest is that of a Shakespearean "Comic Solution". The ending is a happy ending, for Prospero is allowed to once again take his place as the Duke of Milan. However, Prospero must remember and become the Duke he was before his obsession made him turn a blind eye to his people and his duties. In Act 5, Scene 1, Prospero vows that he will break his staff and bury it and that he will also throw his book into the sea where he can never find it again. He also frees his servant spirit, Ariel, as his last words before the Epilogue, sending the spirit off unburdened and no longer under his command. These actions make sure that Prospero never falls back into his old ways and that his obsession will never relapse. With those distractions gone, Prospero is able to take back into his rightful place as Duke of Milan and serve as the leader he should be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)